2026 Fantasy Football Draft Rankings β Top 150
Our NFL fantasy draft rankings for 2026 β data-driven from season projections and value over replacement (VOR), updated daily through draft season. Below is a snapshot of the top 30 overall (PPR); the full top-150 board covers every position and scoring format, and you can draft it live in our mock draft simulator.
Top 30 overall (PPR)
- 1. Christian McCaffrey (RB, SF) β 388.6 proj. pts, VOR 251.9
- 2. Bijan Robinson (RB, ATL) β 376.2 proj. pts, VOR 239.5
- 3. Puka Nacua (WR, LA) β 342.6 proj. pts, VOR 179.3
- 4. De'Von Achane (RB, MIA) β 310.2 proj. pts, VOR 173.6
- 5. Chase Brown (RB, CIN) β 287.8 proj. pts, VOR 151.1
- 6. Josh Allen (QB, BUF) β 384.7 proj. pts, VOR 141.3
- 7. Ja'Marr Chase (WR, CIN) β 298.1 proj. pts, VOR 134.9
- 8. Jahmyr Gibbs (RB, DET) β 269.8 proj. pts, VOR 133.1
- 9. Ashton Jeanty (RB, LV) β 262.0 proj. pts, VOR 125.3
- 10. Amon-Ra St. Brown (WR, DET) β 283.4 proj. pts, VOR 120.2
- 11. Saquon Barkley (RB, PHI) β 253.1 proj. pts, VOR 116.5
- 12. Trey McBride (TE, ARI) β 266.6 proj. pts, VOR 116.1
- 13. Kyren Williams (RB, LA) β 240.2 proj. pts, VOR 103.5
- 14. Travis Etienne (RB, NO) β 236.0 proj. pts, VOR 99.3
- 15. Jonathan Taylor (RB, IND) β 235.6 proj. pts, VOR 98.9
- 16. Derrick Henry (RB, BAL) β 223.4 proj. pts, VOR 86.7
- 17. Rhamondre Stevenson (RB, NE) β 222.2 proj. pts, VOR 85.5
- 18. Tony Pollard (RB, TEN) β 219.0 proj. pts, VOR 82.3
- 19. Kenneth Walker III (RB, KC) β 213.7 proj. pts, VOR 77.0
- 20. Jaxon Smith-Njigba (WR, SEA) β 239.4 proj. pts, VOR 76.2
- 21. Trevor Lawrence (QB, JAX) β 318.1 proj. pts, VOR 74.6
- 22. A.J. Brown (WR, NE) β 236.2 proj. pts, VOR 73.0
- 23. Chris Olave (WR, NO) β 236.0 proj. pts, VOR 72.8
- 24. James Cook (RB, BUF) β 208.9 proj. pts, VOR 72.2
- 25. Kyle Pitts (TE, ATL) β 222.4 proj. pts, VOR 71.9
- 26. Zay Flowers (WR, BAL) β 233.1 proj. pts, VOR 69.9
- 27. Breece Hall (RB, NYJ) β 204.5 proj. pts, VOR 67.8
- 28. D'Andre Swift (RB, CHI) β 202.5 proj. pts, VOR 65.8
- 29. Justin Jefferson (WR, MIN) β 227.8 proj. pts, VOR 64.6
- 30. RJ Harvey (RB, DEN) β 201.1 proj. pts, VOR 64.4
Methodology
Rankings come from our projection model (season-long PPR fantasy points), ordered by VOR β value over replacement: projected points above a freely-available replacement player at the same position. VOR, not raw points, is the standard way to compare value across positions (a high-scoring QB can still rank below a scarcer RB/WR). The board updates daily as injuries, depth charts and ADP shift.
Find the bets where soft books misprice the odds.
See today's value bets β free accountFor the in-season view after kickoff β model projections vs. the market line per player β see our NFL player props.
More draft prep: Draft Sharks alternatives.
Full board + mock draft simulator β freeReading The Value Gaps, Not Just The Names
The most striking thing in this board isn't who's number one β it's the shape of the drop-off. Four of the first five slots are running backs, and the VOR gap from McCaffrey (251.9) to Chase Brown (151.1) is roughly the same size as the gap from Brown all the way down to RJ Harvey at pick 30 (64.4). That's the RB cliff in a single stat: scarcity at the position front-loads value into a handful of names before the pool flattens out.
Quarterback tells almost the opposite story. Josh Allen projects for more raw points (384.7) than every non-RB except Trevor Lawrence, yet his VOR (141.3) only lands him at pick 6, and Lawrence's even bigger point total (318.1) is worth just 74.6 VOR at pick 21. Replacement-level QB play is simply higher than replacement-level RB or WR play, so even a monster passing season adds less marginal value than it looks like on the box score β a reminder that VOR, not points, is doing the real ranking work here.
Tight end is quietly having a strong cycle on this board: Trey McBride's 116.1 VOR at pick 12 rivals several top-15 running backs, and Kyle Pitts still clears 70 VOR at pick 25. Whether that scarcity holds depends on target-share stability for both players, and it's worth remembering these are pre-season marks built on limited recent-season data β worth revisiting once camp reports and route-share numbers start coming in.
One name worth watching for the opposite reason is Justin Jefferson at pick 29 despite elite name recognition β his projected total (227.8) sits below several less-heralded receivers, a gap likely tied to situational or target-share assumptions in the model rather than any doubt about his talent. It's a good example of why checking the projection inputs, not just the name, matters heading into a draft.
Included with every account β even the free one.