Not all sportsbooks price equally well. Sharp books like Pinnacle move fast and post tight margins; softer books lag the market and regularly leave beatable prices on the board. This index measures that difference with our own data: the closing line value (CLV) our betting engine actually captured at each book, and the average margin (vig) each book builds into its odds. Higher CLV at a book means its prices sat above the sharp closing line more often β the classic signature of a soft book.
Data updated: 23 Oct 2026 Β· margins over the last 30 days of pre-kickoff odds
| # | Bookmaker | Avg CLVour taken odds vs Pinnacle close | Yield | Margin (match odds) | Margin (totals) | Bets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1xBet | β | β | 0.27% | 3.67% | 15 |
| 2 | Codere (IT) | β | β | 2.61% | 9.06% | 2 |
| 3 | Marathonbet | β | β | 3.04% | 5.65% | 16 |
| 4 | Unibet (SE) | β | β | 3.15% | 6.48% | 1 |
| 5 | Coolbet | β | β | 3.18% | 4.81% | 10 |
| 6 | Unibet (NL) | β | β | 3.26% | 6.13% | 12 |
| 7 | Bovada | β | β | 4.05% | β | β |
| 8 | Pinnaclesharp reference | β | β | 4.09% | 3.84% | β |
| 9 | Draftkings | β | β | 4.31% | β | β |
| 10 | Tipico (DE) | β | β | 4.55% | 7.24% | 3 |
| 11 | LeoVegas (SE) | β | β | 4.79% | 6.92% | 9 |
| 12 | Betrivers | β | β | 5.41% | β | 2 |
| 13 | Everygame | β | β | 5.47% | 4.71% | 21 |
| 14 | Fanduel | β | β | 5.62% | β | 2 |
| 15 | Betsson | β | β | 5.93% | 5.76% | 5 |
| 16 | Winamax (DE) | β | β | 6.00% | β | 2 |
| 17 | NordicBet | β | β | 6.00% | 6.32% | 6 |
| 18 | Betclic (FR) | β | β | 6.65% | β | 1 |
| 19 | William Hill | β | β | 7.38% | 6.77% | 3 |
| 20 | 888sport | β | β | 7.74% | 5.59% | 3 |
| 21 | Unibet (FR) | β | β | 9.35% | β | β |
| 22 | Winamax (FR) | β | β | 9.48% | β | β |
| 23 | Suprabets | β | β | 9.48% | β | β |
| 24 | PMU (FR) | β | β | 10.36% | 13.68% | β |
Method: "Avg CLV" compares the odds our value engine actually took at a book against Pinnacle's de-vigged closing line, on moneyline-type markets only (match winner / h2h) β the market family where CLV is a statistically reliable signal. It is shown once a book has at least 30 settled bets in our system. One honest caveat: this sample is conditioned on our own bet selection β we only bet where our engine sees value, so it measures how often a book leaves beatable prices, not its overall pricing quality. "Margin" is model-independent: the average overround built into a book's pre-kickoff odds over the last 30 days (minimum 500 stored price snapshots). Excluded feeds (stale exchanges, US-only books) are not listed. Yield is realized profit over stakes at that book β small samples swing hard, so read it alongside CLV, not instead of it.
Our engine compares every price at these books against Pinnacle's sharp line and flags the beatable ones β every settled pick lands in the public track record, wins and losses alike.
A sharp book (Pinnacle is the canonical example) welcomes winning players, posts low margins and moves its lines quickly on new information β its closing price is the best public estimate of the true probability. A soft book courts recreational players, bakes in higher margins, and is slower to move β which is exactly why beatable prices appear there.
Closing line value is the gap between the odds you took and the sharp market's final pre-kickoff price. Consistently beating the close is the strongest statistical evidence of long-term profitability. If our engine keeps capturing positive CLV at a book, that book systematically posts prices above the sharp close β it's soft. We only report CLV for moneyline-type markets, where it is a reliable signal.
Books shade different markets differently. Margins on main match odds are competitive because that's where price-comparison happens; totals and side markets often carry an extra point or two of vig. Comparing both columns shows where each book actually earns its money.
That's the practical use, yes: books near the top of the table have historically left the most beatable prices for our engine. Remember the flip side β soft books limit winning customers, so longevity matters, and nothing here is a guarantee about any individual bet.